Posted on May 10, 2017. Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: , , , , , , , , |

For some people in Britain as well as parts of the European Union, the general feeling towards the EU project can be possibly be summed up, more or less as that, the EU leaders continue to remain disconnected with the reality, and  fail to grasp the reality on the ground.  Some do argue that, by coming across as being acting elitist, the policy makers are destroying competitiveness of European business.  The evidence is that, across industries, the cost of compliance for European companies has increased significantly year-on-year.  And instead of using BREXIT as an opportunity to fix a very inefficient system, the leaders keep talking in terms of rhetoric.

I firmly believe that, no one in London wants EU to fail, and it shouldn’t, because it has delivered peace across Europe. But European Union as an idea is full of flaws, and just ask those, who paid and continue to pay the human price for being a European. My own assessment is that, BREXIT isn’t good for UK or the EU, and that’s the reality, but it’s also an opportunity. European Union badly needs reform, and its not that Europeans have started falling in love with Brussels post BREXIT.

As I see it, Britain is getting out of European Union and not the continent of  Europe. So lets have that perspective. I don’t see European Union working out in its current shape, and the four principles that EU leaders keep talking about, are completely unsustainable together, because they create serious misallocation of resources. There was no socioeconomic impact assessment done on expansion of European Union, we all know what happens to a Company that goes through a expansion drive, without a well thought out strategy. So why not fix the flaws, and then sell the product wisely to the public, and let’s see if the potential customers buy into it?  No point lecturing  people, if they reject your product or fail to understand what you are selling,  and providing a good customer service is key to making a product work.

 European Union as a product will need to evolve , and it will be good for European politicians to understand that, the language of business as well as science still remains English, and that’s not going to change in the foreseeable future. Also London will continue to remain an attractive jurisdiction, and the world of finance will continue to be dominated by English. The opportunities are still out there, and I sincerely hope that, politicians across Europe including the U.K. will come together, to make good of those opportunities, and maximise it for their shareholders, in other words, the common citizens.

Also to some extent, people in Britain fail to understand that, in continental Europe, there is a genuine love affair with the idea of European Union, and that is, for a number of reasons, which I won’t go into. So yes, like any love affair, the journey will be driven by emotion. And it’s not that, the average people don’t understand that, there are serious design flaws with the idea of European Union, but when you are in love, you are in love. And, I think, Britain will do well being mindful of this fact, while negotiating its exit from the EU. Also, on the British side, there are people who are extremely attached to the idea of Great Britain and its glory. So there are emotional attachments on both sides, and yes I fully appreciate that, the will of the people has to be enforced, and it should be, or what’s the point of a democratic system. But when we are talking about a permanent change, the prudent thing to do, will be to keep the emotions aside, and have a boringly dispassionate approach towards figuring out a way forward that works for all sides. No point being nasty, in the end, we will have to learn, to live with each other. Europe needs Britain and Britain needs Europe, it’s just a fact, and we shouldn’t be confused about it.

By over playing their hands, both sides is taking the risk of doing permanent damage. Love affairs can get nasty, and quite frankly Britain’s relationship with the EU was never based on love. But British diplomats and the politicians do need to factor in the reality that, whether it’s Mr Juncker or Mr Tusk, there is a genuine love affair with the idea of European Union. And we need to learn to respect that love, instead of criticising others for being in love. What we are looking at today is, potentially a lose – lose outcome for all sides, and it’s hard to practically see otherwise. And that’s why it is important that leaders in European Union, instead of punishing Britain for not being in Love, try to understand that, sometimes relationships don’t work, and also sometimes people do patch things up.  Also, why not make some changes, to accommodate each other, after all that’s what a good relationship is all about, or am I missing something ? There is an opportunity, so why not make the most of it ?

Government officials across European Union, are all making concerted effort in figuring out, what they can do to attract businesses, to move from london. And their pitch is not bad at all, but as a business, you have to ask yourself, do you buy into a series of promise or do you wait, to see how much of what is being promised will get delivered on the ground. I am afraid, the reality is, it will be a big struggle for a single European city to replace london. Because london built itself over hundreds of years, into what it has become today, and quite frankly, it’s a daunting task for one European city to replace London entirely. So yes, bits and pieces of what london is offering can be moved to other parts of the EU, but that won’t be enough for a business really. Also a major issue is language, contrary to what politicians in the EU might say, the language of business is English, and there is no way, you can force the world to change to French now. And I am beginning to also sense that, there is a genuine fear among some bureaucrats in Brussels that, if Britain makes a success of its exit from the EU then, others will most likely follow.

So with all that, here are some ideas worth looking into, while UK is on the BREXIT Road.

  • lower the corporate tax rate to 18%
  • provide 2- years tax exemptions on profit of startups with 5 employees
  • lower the personal tax rate for people earning over £ 350,000  to 36%
  • lower the personal tax rate for people earning between £ 50,000 to £ 150,000 to 30%
  • keep the basic rate for people earning between £ 12,000 to £ 49,000 around 20%
  • people earning £ 45,000 and over will pay £ 25 flat access fee for GP and A&E visits and £ 35 access fee could be charged to non residents.
  • a stamp duty surcharge of 5.5% could be levied on non resident buyers of residential properties in the U.K. This surcharge could be used to partially pay for building more social housing.
  • working with the depart of trade & industry create a business mentorship program, where business schools from across U.K. could partner with SMEs, to provide them free of charge essential advisory support on how to grow and better manage the business. Business schools with the support of department of trade & Industry could mentor existing SMEs, and help find ways to grow sustainably.
  • set up a £ 5 billion business support fund, in partnership with private sector, to help fund start up investments requiring £ 30,000 to £ 750,000 in seed funding. The trust acting on behalf of the government could take 25 % of the exit value, in order to generate profit. This fund could be funded by a combination of surcharge of 1.5% on Tobacco and from the profit generated by exiting the investments in the startups as well as allowing councils across the UK to support and subsidise startups.
  • expand the capacity at both London GatWick and Heathrow, to ease the congestion
  • dial down on the cost of non critical regulatory compliance on businesses and the cost of compliance on businesses
  • work out a deal with the EU to access the single market by paying an annual membership fee. UK runs a trade deficit with the EU, and it is in the interest of European Union, to not lose a market that imports around £ 290 billion in good and services from the EU annually. A short term disruption will result in very sizeable job losses and also closings of businesses across the EU. Many SMEs that are reliant on selling to their customers in the U.K. will have serious losses, so it’s in the interest of EU, to work out a deal on trade.
  • reposition London as the offshore hub  for YUAN, Indian Rupees and other important emerging currencies by supporting their capital market transactions through london, a common regulatory framework could be worked out in partnership with regulators from key emerging countries, to enable companies from these key emerging markets, to access capital as well as other vital resources through London.
  • make it easier for people with high skills and high net worth to come and live in the UK
  • develop key cities across U.K. for sectors that will play a dominant role in the future, for example, make parts of U.K. the hub for AI related technological developments as well as space among others
  • pitch Oxford, Cambridge and Edinburgh as technology centres of the world
  • enable partnership between schools and businesses, to help with skills development
  • to help build the soft power of London, help create legislation that will enable non governmental organisations from across the world to house their outfits in london.
  • help UK based premier Universities and colleges to attract the brightest minds from across the world
Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 1 so far )

A problem made in the HELLENIC Republic

Posted on January 26, 2015. Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

So the topic of GREECE and what happens to Europe going forward has once again taken the centre stage, and I do wonder, when  people talk about  GREECE or other EURO area countries return to a pre-crisis period as if that was the permanent normal, and somehow the European policy makers should find a way restore it, do in fact understand the reality and the underlying causes of their current predicament?

The disappointment that people on the street across the EU feel in general is understandable, and also their frustration with the system is justifiable as the leadership have so far failed to deliver for the people. But that’s not the complete picture. The reality is, the crises that unfolded in many Euro area countries was mostly of their own making, and the life style that most people got used to  during  good times wasn’t paid for, and therefore the expectation of going back to what some people might mistakenly consider normal is not only unrealistic but also dangerous. A wholesale reorganisation of the overall economy of the Euro area countries is a must, and this has to be a continuous ongoing reality because without it, the EUROPEAN UNION as we know it today will most likely fail to remain relevant in a very competitive global economy going forward.

And  social economics isn’t about giving away freebies that a nation and its people can’t afford , but it should be about creating and giving equal opportunity to everyone so people can make their own future. A social safety net should not be designed as a net that traps people but it should serve as a spring board that provides or facilitates  a safe landing when you fall , but is also able to push people back up again.

The problem of Euro area nations including of GREECE isn’t just that the country has too much debt overhang, yes in case of GREECE , the GDP to debt ratio of 175% is certainly quite high, but Greece spends less than 4.4 %  of its GDP to service these debts, and in fact on parts of its loans, Greece currently pays no interest, also it is able to collect back the yield it pays to the ECB and other central banks who hold the country’s debt so this lowers the overall debt servicing costs further to less than 2.7%. Also the average maturity of GREEK debt is over 16 years, greater than that of Germany, France or Italy for that matter. So the write down of GREEK debt on its own isn’t going to drive growth. However, a case can made for extending the loans by another 8 to 10 years, and also create a provision that allows for a freeze in interest payment if the country’s growth starts to falter. This exercise will most certainly make the overall debt profile of the country look more sustainable, but it won’t do much with regards to growth unless and until Greece becomes an attractive investment story.

The austerity has killed consumption in the country as the disposable income is almost non existent, and also created a huge human costs in terms of long term unemployment, loss of basic healthcare support , broken families and communities and a lost young generation. But this situation can drastically deteriorate if GREECE was outside of the Euro area, a super hyper inflation followed by catastrophic bankruptcy of the country  creating a hellish type worst case scenario with a very bleak future from which coming back will require a powerful miracle.

The average people on the street have paid a very heavy price and continue to do so for the mistakes made by a reckless political class and also some of the rich and famous who continued to ( and still do in some cases )  to misuse the system driven mostly by greed. The GREEK economy was too small at the time and is even smaller today to sustain a non productive spending spree of any government. So a restructuring and reorganisation of the overall GREEK economy has to be a priority for the next government. The problem facing the  Greek economy  today wasn’t created outside but it was made and created in the HELLENIC Republic itself.

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( None so far )

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...

%d bloggers like this: